<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Katharine Hepburn&#8217;s brownies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/02/16/katharine-hepburns-brownies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/02/16/katharine-hepburns-brownies/</link>
	<description>Recipes from scratch and a lot of chatter about food ( plus a little about politics )</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:15:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ellaella</title>
		<link>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/02/16/katharine-hepburns-brownies/#comment-4609</link>
		<dc:creator>ellaella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodpluspolitics.com/?p=1732#comment-4609</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t David Lean wonderful? &lt;em&gt;Brief Encounter&lt;/em&gt; is one of my favorite movies and I think it was the reason I got on a rent-a-Lean kick and discovered &lt;em&gt;Summertime&lt;/em&gt;.  

Good point about the feminine ideal, although I don&#039;t think our culture will ever move away from &quot;thinner is better.&quot; Maybe one reason Audrey - the other Hepubrn - endures as an icon is the word &lt;em&gt;gamine &lt;/em&gt;that&#039;s always associated with her. Totally non-threatening. (And she was either anorexic or bulimic, I forget which, but there&#039;s that thin thing again.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t David Lean wonderful? <em>Brief Encounter</em> is one of my favorite movies and I think it was the reason I got on a rent-a-Lean kick and discovered <em>Summertime</em>.  </p>
<p>Good point about the feminine ideal, although I don&#8217;t think our culture will ever move away from &#8220;thinner is better.&#8221; Maybe one reason Audrey &#8211; the other Hepubrn &#8211; endures as an icon is the word <em>gamine </em>that&#8217;s always associated with her. Totally non-threatening. (And she was either anorexic or bulimic, I forget which, but there&#8217;s that thin thing again.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canadada</title>
		<link>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/02/16/katharine-hepburns-brownies/#comment-4600</link>
		<dc:creator>canadada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodpluspolitics.com/?p=1732#comment-4600</guid>
		<description>yum AGAIN ... and you cite two of my favourites, Lean and Hepburn ... 

Contemporary Kate Winslett has an an &#039;aura&#039; of that Grand Dame &#039;Kate&#039; as does Ann Hathaway have a whiff of Audrey Hepburn about her ... 

Tis interesting how the spread continues to exist within the feminine &#039;ideal&#039; -  from &#039;tom boyish&#039; to &#039;ultra feminine&#039; - no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yum AGAIN &#8230; and you cite two of my favourites, Lean and Hepburn &#8230; </p>
<p>Contemporary Kate Winslett has an an &#8216;aura&#8217; of that Grand Dame &#8216;Kate&#8217; as does Ann Hathaway have a whiff of Audrey Hepburn about her &#8230; </p>
<p>Tis interesting how the spread continues to exist within the feminine &#8216;ideal&#8217; &#8211;  from &#8216;tom boyish&#8217; to &#8216;ultra feminine&#8217; &#8211; no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ellaella</title>
		<link>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/02/16/katharine-hepburns-brownies/#comment-4587</link>
		<dc:creator>ellaella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodpluspolitics.com/?p=1732#comment-4587</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ian &lt;/strong&gt;- Rich indeed. Cutting this into 16 portions doesn&#039;t seem mean. It&#039;s sensible. I can&#039;t help but wonder if slender Hepburn ever really ate things like this, unless she had a metabolism like a rocket. 

Brownies &lt;em&gt;Cockaigne&lt;/em&gt;? How precious. :D And you have all that wonderfu European chocolate at your fingertips. Mmmmmm!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ian </strong>- Rich indeed. Cutting this into 16 portions doesn&#8217;t seem mean. It&#8217;s sensible. I can&#8217;t help but wonder if slender Hepburn ever really ate things like this, unless she had a metabolism like a rocket. </p>
<p>Brownies <em>Cockaigne</em>? How precious. <img src='http://foodpluspolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  And you have all that wonderfu European chocolate at your fingertips. Mmmmmm!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ellaella</title>
		<link>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/02/16/katharine-hepburns-brownies/#comment-4586</link>
		<dc:creator>ellaella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodpluspolitics.com/?p=1732#comment-4586</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jenni &lt;/strong&gt;- I love that quote! I hadn&#039;t heard it. Without thinking, I tacked on &quot;with your fingers.&quot; :D &lt;em&gt;Cakey brownie&lt;/em&gt; almost seems a contraction of terms, doesn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jenni </strong>- I love that quote! I hadn&#8217;t heard it. Without thinking, I tacked on &#8220;with your fingers.&#8221; <img src='http://foodpluspolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  <em>Cakey brownie</em> almost seems a contraction of terms, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian in hamburg</title>
		<link>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/02/16/katharine-hepburns-brownies/#comment-4585</link>
		<dc:creator>ian in hamburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodpluspolitics.com/?p=1732#comment-4585</guid>
		<description>The Joy of Cooking (hardcover, updated 1997 edition) recommends all ingredients be first at room temperature before you start out.  That&#039;s for their Brownies Cockaigne, a concoction I love to serve.   The biggest difference I see between Hepburn&#039;s and the Joy of Cooking&#039;s is Hepburn uses only half the flour but twice the butter.  Rich!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Joy of Cooking (hardcover, updated 1997 edition) recommends all ingredients be first at room temperature before you start out.  That&#8217;s for their Brownies Cockaigne, a concoction I love to serve.   The biggest difference I see between Hepburn&#8217;s and the Joy of Cooking&#8217;s is Hepburn uses only half the flour but twice the butter.  Rich!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.783 seconds -->
