<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Contradictory study on organics and nutrition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/07/29/contradictory-study-on-organics-and-nutrition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/07/29/contradictory-study-on-organics-and-nutrition/</link>
	<description>Recipes from scratch and a lot of chatter about food ( plus a little about politics )</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:15:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Important Study Excluded from FSA Review of Organic Food Research &#124; From Scratch</title>
		<link>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/07/29/contradictory-study-on-organics-and-nutrition/#comment-5896</link>
		<dc:creator>Important Study Excluded from FSA Review of Organic Food Research &#124; From Scratch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 12:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodpluspolitics.com/?p=4281#comment-5896</guid>
		<description>[...] relating to organic food that concluded organics are not more nutritious &#8212; the one that I noted contradicts an earlier huge study funded by the EU &#8212; is the subject of another piece in today&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] relating to organic food that concluded organics are not more nutritious &#8212; the one that I noted contradicts an earlier huge study funded by the EU &#8212; is the subject of another piece in today&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ellaella</title>
		<link>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/07/29/contradictory-study-on-organics-and-nutrition/#comment-5893</link>
		<dc:creator>ellaella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 09:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodpluspolitics.com/?p=4281#comment-5893</guid>
		<description>No apology needed -- thanks, Muse! It&#039;s a shame it took 2 days for someone else to notice but I guess that&#039;s beside the point. The Telegraph (aka: Torygaph) ran an interesting &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/foodanddrink/5949692/Organic-food-gets-a-raw-deal-from-the-FSA.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;follow-up article&lt;/a&gt; - I didn&#039;t know the FSA (which funded this study) has a history in this regard. The piece begins &lt;em&gt;&quot;What&#039;s with the Food Standards Agency and organic food? It just can&#039;t leave it alone. Not, of course, in the sense of wanting to wolf it down, but in trying to persuade the us not to do so.&quot;&lt;/em&gt; Should have been noted in the original report, I think.

(And I&#039;m still wondering how our prarie dogs could look different from yours and wishing I could find those slides!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No apology needed &#8212; thanks, Muse! It&#8217;s a shame it took 2 days for someone else to notice but I guess that&#8217;s beside the point. The Telegraph (aka: Torygaph) ran an interesting <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/foodanddrink/5949692/Organic-food-gets-a-raw-deal-from-the-FSA.html" rel="nofollow">follow-up article</a> &#8211; I didn&#8217;t know the FSA (which funded this study) has a history in this regard. The piece begins <em>&#8220;What&#8217;s with the Food Standards Agency and organic food? It just can&#8217;t leave it alone. Not, of course, in the sense of wanting to wolf it down, but in trying to persuade the us not to do so.&#8221;</em> Should have been noted in the original report, I think.</p>
<p>(And I&#8217;m still wondering how our prarie dogs could look different from yours and wishing I could find those slides!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MusEditions</title>
		<link>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/07/29/contradictory-study-on-organics-and-nutrition/#comment-5889</link>
		<dc:creator>MusEditions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodpluspolitics.com/?p=4281#comment-5889</guid>
		<description>And &lt;a title=&quot;UK Study misleads&quot; href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-hirshberg/uk-study-misleads-public_b_248446.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this just in&lt;/a&gt; from HuffPo: &quot;Study ignores documented benefits of Organics&quot;
(I apologize for linking elsewhere, but it&#039;s more fuel for balance on this important issue.) :)
.-= MusEditions&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://museditions.wordpress.com/2009/07/27/anatomy-of-a-blogroll/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Anatomy of a Blogroll&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And <a title="UK Study misleads" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-hirshberg/uk-study-misleads-public_b_248446.html" rel="nofollow">this just in</a> from HuffPo: &#8220;Study ignores documented benefits of Organics&#8221;<br />
(I apologize for linking elsewhere, but it&#8217;s more fuel for balance on this important issue.) <img src='http://foodpluspolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
<span class="cluv"> MusEditions&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://museditions.wordpress.com/2009/07/27/anatomy-of-a-blogroll/" rel="nofollow">Anatomy of a Blogroll</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://foodpluspolitics.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ellaella</title>
		<link>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/07/29/contradictory-study-on-organics-and-nutrition/#comment-5882</link>
		<dc:creator>ellaella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodpluspolitics.com/?p=4281#comment-5882</guid>
		<description>It does complement the earlier post this month (thanks for linking to it!) and you&#039;re absolutely right about taking in information and making a decision. It reminds me of the wonderful slogan of Syms, a clothing discounter in NYC: &lt;em&gt;An educated consumer is our best customer.&lt;/em&gt;

I am semi-amazed, though, at the amnesia in the reports of this latest study. That EU study was huge. Of course untold journalists have lost their jobs since then, thanks to the recession, so perhaps context is a victim too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does complement the earlier post this month (thanks for linking to it!) and you&#8217;re absolutely right about taking in information and making a decision. It reminds me of the wonderful slogan of Syms, a clothing discounter in NYC: <em>An educated consumer is our best customer.</em></p>
<p>I am semi-amazed, though, at the amnesia in the reports of this latest study. That EU study was huge. Of course untold journalists have lost their jobs since then, thanks to the recession, so perhaps context is a victim too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MusEditions</title>
		<link>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/07/29/contradictory-study-on-organics-and-nutrition/#comment-5880</link>
		<dc:creator>MusEditions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodpluspolitics.com/?p=4281#comment-5880</guid>
		<description>This, to me, is a companion piece to your &lt;a href=&quot;http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/07/03/organic-doesnt-always-mean-safer-or-better/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;recent post&lt;/a&gt; on organics. All we can really do is consume as much good, reliable information as we can (like your blog!) and then use our own conclusions and intuitions to make the best choices for us as individuals. And the advice from that movie, &quot;Follow the money.&quot;, is worth considering.
.-= MusEditions&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://museditions.wordpress.com/2009/07/27/anatomy-of-a-blogroll/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Anatomy of a Blogroll&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This, to me, is a companion piece to your <a href="http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/07/03/organic-doesnt-always-mean-safer-or-better/" rel="nofollow">recent post</a> on organics. All we can really do is consume as much good, reliable information as we can (like your blog!) and then use our own conclusions and intuitions to make the best choices for us as individuals. And the advice from that movie, &#8220;Follow the money.&#8221;, is worth considering.<br />
<span class="cluv"> MusEditions&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://museditions.wordpress.com/2009/07/27/anatomy-of-a-blogroll/" rel="nofollow">Anatomy of a Blogroll</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://foodpluspolitics.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.080 seconds -->
