<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>From Scratch &#187; nutrition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foodpluspolitics.com/tag/nutrition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foodpluspolitics.com</link>
	<description>Recipes from scratch and a lot of chatter about food ( plus a little about politics )</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:03:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Reading labels: stuffing mixes</title>
		<link>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/11/17/reading-labels-stuffing-mixes/</link>
		<comments>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/11/17/reading-labels-stuffing-mixes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ellaella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading labels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thanksgiving]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodpluspolitics.com/?p=4832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me emphasize at the start that I&#8217;m NOT in any way suggesting people not use these products, nor do I look askance at anyone who does. I totally get their appeal and convenience, which led me to discover some eye-openers on the packages a few years ago. I like knowing what&#8217;s in packages; nobody [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/11/17/reading-labels-stuffing-mixes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Penzey&#8217;s salt free Mural of Flavor</title>
		<link>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/11/10/penzeys-salt-free-mural-of-flavor/</link>
		<comments>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/11/10/penzeys-salt-free-mural-of-flavor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ellaella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbs and spices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodpluspolitics.com/?p=4760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Margaret Thatcher met the then-USSR&#8217;s rising star, Mikhail Gorbachev, in 1984 she famously declared, &#8220;He&#8217;s a man we can do business with.&#8221; When it comes to salt-free seasonings, Mural of Flavor is my Gorbachev.
I&#8217;ve tried so many others over the years. Either they were bitter or too bland or just tasted like what they [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/11/10/penzeys-salt-free-mural-of-flavor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surprise! Some HFCS might contain mercury</title>
		<link>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/08/14/surprise-some-hfcs-might-contain-mercury/</link>
		<comments>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/08/14/surprise-some-hfcs-might-contain-mercury/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ellaella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HFCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodpluspolitics.com/?p=4404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chances are you&#8217;ve seen the warnings from our junk food companies about a possible sugar shortage that could make candy, donuts and other treats more expensive. And I wondered, since high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) is a cheap alternative, responsible for 1 in 10 calories consumed by the average American, if that might in turn require [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/08/14/surprise-some-hfcs-might-contain-mercury/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grilled Buffalo shrimp</title>
		<link>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/08/09/grilled-buffalo-shrimp/</link>
		<comments>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/08/09/grilled-buffalo-shrimp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 12:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ellaella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[recipes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seafood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appetizer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[easy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthy recipes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shrimp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodpluspolitics.com/?p=4342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Why didn&#8217;t I think of this? If it weren&#8217;t for the fat, I&#8217;d eat Buffalo wings three times a week so when this alternative, an easy recipe for Buffalo Shrimp, appeared in my sidebar I put shrimp on the shopping list. Boy, is it good. For anyone still under the impression that shrimp is too [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/08/09/grilled-buffalo-shrimp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting footnote to new organics study</title>
		<link>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/08/02/interesting-footnote-to-new-organics-study/</link>
		<comments>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/08/02/interesting-footnote-to-new-organics-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 12:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ellaella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foodpluspolitics.com/?p=4315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week&#8217;s study of research relating to organic food that concluded organics are not more nutritious  &#8212; the one that I noted contradicts an earlier huge study funded by the EU &#8212; is the subject of another piece  in today&#8217;s London Sunday Times. And guess what? It says the EU study was not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://foodpluspolitics.com/2009/08/02/interesting-footnote-to-new-organics-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.535 seconds -->
